Geek For E!

Movie Review: The Last Witch Hunter

The Last Witch HunterGorgeously detailed set design, a fascinating mythology of witches & the “Axe and Hammer” society tasked with keeping them from harming humans, and action sequences that are messy but cool as [Radio Edit] breathe life into The Last Witch Hunter.  Diesel does a great job doing the same basic character he’s done in F&F and Riddick, and his ennui-cum-world-weary demeanor works perfectly here.  Pity a 180 degree, out-of-nowhere switcheroo in one character’s arc whole being throws a wrench into the works at the climax.

Is the plot a huge mess that throws a cool new mythos at you in the hope that you’ll forgive the fact that this film is nothing more than “man kicks butt amongst all the CGI”?  Abso-witchin’-lutely.  Then again if you’re coming to see a movie about a witch hunter that does nothing but kick butt and you expect coherence?  Baby, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

The Last Witch Hunter feels like the start of a series, and if it does even so-so box office I’m betting that’s exactly what’ll happen.  Which is fine, because the trio of Disel’s Witch Hunter Kaulder, witch-with-a-heart-o-gold Chloe (Rose Leslie, Game of Thrones) and Kaulder’s Catholic Church babysitter-cum-biographer Dolan is a cool gang to watch.  Though I’m hoping Leslie will get to say “YOU KNOW NOTHING KAULDER” at some point in the inevitable sequel.  BTW, folks hoping for more of Leslie’s awesome Ygritte-styled throwdowns will be disappointed here; Leslie’s witch Chloe is a bartender, not a fighter.  Y’know, unless you really push her.  tl;dr: don’t expect bows and arrows here.

A blast of a horror/action film that’s perfect for Halloween, even if I did get incredibly peeved at the strange lack of character consistency at one point.  Here’s hoping that if they pull another “Gotcha!” moment with a sequel, that they actually leave some mystery to a character that will allow such a shift to be believable.  But this time, go for Diesel whoopin’ seriously evil witch tuchas.

Grade: B-

Movie Review: Freeheld

freeheld onesheetNutshell: a story about two quiet people who had to stand up for their rights doesn’t have to be this quiet.  In searching for the heart of this story, the filmmakers lost its soul.  Grade: C

I wasn’t sure what I thought of Freeheld after I saw it.  I wasn’t sure a week later. I’m a card-carrying hippie commie pinko; shouldn’t I be falling all over myself to worship a film that’s brave enough to tackle the story of a woman and her domestic partner fighting the system for equal rights?

It’s a quiet film.  But does a film have to shout to get its message across?  It doesn’t dig too deeply into the personal lives of the real-life folks these characters are based on.  But does a film need to uncover everything in order to be true to that person?

Well, a film doesn’t need to shout to get itself heard. And it doesn’t have to delve into every painful, agonizing moment to paint a full and accurate representation onscreen.  However, it does need to go beyond the surface of the people in the story, and the message needs to be more than “hey, d’ja hear about this?”  Freeheld has a powerful, uplifting true story at its heart.  It’s got amazing actors, and a screenwriter (Ron Nyswaner, Philadelphia) that knows how to deliver the biopic goods.

But the film doesn’t rise to its potential.  Instead, Freeheld simply shows you images of a life lived, and people who lived it.  It pulls heartstrings shamelessly, without giving you a feeling for the people living the story.  Did I tear up a time or two during this film?  Absolutely; you’d have to be dead inside not to.   But this film feels like the echo of a story, rather than the story itself.  The lives of Laurel Hester and Stacie Andree as they fought for Hester’s ability to pass her pension on to her partner Andree were filled with pain, hopelessness and ultimately triumph.  But Freeheld doesn’t go beyond the typical Lifetime movie treatment.

From what I’ve pieced together from the film, these women were intensely private people.  They lived normal lives, had a dog, a cute house the fixed up, and a very strong love for each other.  But you’ll have to piece together everything about these women beyond what set design and art direction can tell you.  Hester’s battle with cancer is shown in pieces, and these pieces are heartbreaking.  But they’re just pieces.  Julianne Moore’s Hester is trotted out now and again to show that yes, cancer is horrible.  Ellen Page’s Andree is shown working as a mechanic, as if that’s the only way to show that Andree is her own person as well as Hester’s partner.  Even Steve Carell’s larger-than-life flamboyantly alive attorney Steven Goldstein feels muted.  It’s as if someone grabbed the soft focus from Barbara Walters’ interviews and used it on this story.  Everything here feels distant.

The only bits of clarity comes from two of the supporting players, Michael Shannon as Hester’s partner Dane Wells, and Luke Grimes as fellow officer Todd Belkin.  Shannon does an excellent job hinting at feelings Wells might have had for Hester, while supporting her and her partner through the legal battle.  And as closeted cop Belkin, Grimes manages to put more feeling into his brief moments onscreen than Page and Moore are allowed to show in the entire film.  Because really, it’s not the issue that Page and Moore can’t emote — watch Juno and Still Alice — it’s that their performances feel hemmed in, scrubbed clean of true depth.  And that I lay at the feet of director Peter Sollett.

Fellow pinkos, head out to Freeheld if you’re really jonesing to get your LBGT civil rights happy nice time on. But you can also just sit tight and wait for Stonewall, which hits later this year.  That works too.

Awards Season Watch: the beautiful closing credits song by Miley Cyrus, “Hands of Love”, is sure to be nominated for Best Song this year.  As the credits rolled I was picturing the performance.  I’m betting on lots of flowing white fabric.  Or disco teddy bears.  Maybe both.

 

Movie Review: Crimson Peak

crimson peak onesheetCrimson Peak would probably have been a much more effective film if it hadn’t telegraphed it’s ghost reveals so early into the story. I’ll say that right now.  Most of the chills I expected to experience were watered down by my knowing exactly why the ghosts were there, and what they wanted.

But there’s some serious awesome here to take your mind off waiting for the climax.  The dripping, oozing gothic mansion is a dastardly delight.  Speaking of, Hiddleston, Chastain, Wasikowska and Hunnam all have solid careers in the gothic genre if their star-power careers ever bore them.  Bonus points for casting Supernatural’s Jim “Bobby” Beaver as “Mr. Cushing”.  That’s so cool on so many levels.

Peak is definitely overkill, from the hyper-stylized costumes to the hammy yet still engagingly creepy performances.  And riffs on The Shining, Jane Eyre, The Haunting and many other classics sometimes feel a bit too obvious.  Still, for all it’s bombastic excess, Crimson Peak manages to deliver a creepy good time, with director  Guillermo del Toro spinning a Hammer films-like Gothic with a 21st Century heart.  Good, bloody, chilling fun, and a perfect Halloween haunted house.  Grade: B

“Everest” succeeds in hitting the heights

everest onesheet

Everest manages to tell a true story without stooping to creative license add-ons.  The characters may lack depth, but the mountain’s majesty — and the story’s horrifying heartbreak — more than make up for it. Grade: B+

First things first; Everest is not the feel-good movie of the 2015 awards season.  The film — based on the nonfiction book Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster by Jon Krakauer — is relentless, frightening and unnerving.  Director Baltasar Kormákur gives no quarter, and there’s no rest from the horrors unfolding once the trek up Mount Everest goes wrong.

Another plus; the screenplay doesn’t stray far from the true story.  William Nicholson’s work on Gladiator, Les Misérables and Unbroken and Simon Beaufort’s on 127 Hours and Slumdog Millionaire are evident here.  Though the plot jumps from one group to another, it’s easy to follow and the tension doesn’t let up for a second.

And then there’s the cinematography.  This is where you want to spring for the full IMAX 3D thing.  Filmed in Nepal, Iceland and the Italian Alps, it’s absolutely breathtaking.  There’s beauty, and a savage grace to the film, and while I could never get up the courage to scale Everest, I can see why so many attempt it.  (Though I’d love to make it to Base Camp.  Even before any real climbing or need for O2, it still looks like an amazing experience.)  Might as well just put Salvatore Totino’s name in the Oscar pool, because a nomination for Best Cinematography is in the bag here.  Everest seems like a “set up cameras and shoot” film, but I know there must have been a ton of production design that went into making everything look so natural.  I’d love to dig deeper into that.  The realism and attention to detail is staggering. Even little things like the prayer flags strewn everywhere, the oxygen tanks and other things left on the mountain, and the way the snow and ice freeze on people depending on the way the wind blows…it’s all done remarkably well.  And shout out to the product placements; hey, North Face, Helly Hanson, Columbia et al. are stuff climbers/hikers actually use.  In this case, I’m pleased they trotted out labels.

Onward, to the story itself.  As this film deals with the disaster on Mt. Everest in 1996 — when several groups of climbers tried to climb at the same time, causing time delays that lead to many being stranded on or near the peak when a massive storm hit, leading to the deaths of 8 people — all these characters can also feel like a clusterbleep.  But focusing on a handful of the characters helps lend a cohesiveness to the overall story.  So do hardcore performances by Jason Clarke, John Hawkes, Michael Kelly, Sam Worthington, Josh Brolin, and Jake Gyllenhaal, as some of the climbers.  Kudos also go to the amazing Emily Watson and Keira Knightley as “base camp mom” Helen Wilton, and Jan Arnold, the wife of one of the climbers.  Putting in my bet that this ensemble will get a tap for SAG’s Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture.  Hint: the final scenes on the mountain, where one character knows he won’t make it and has one last satellite call to his wife?  If you’re not tearing up, you’re dead inside.

From the first frame of Everest, you see how incredibly insane it is to attempt to scale this mountain; the majesty of  Mt. Everest can’t be denied.  Neither can the casual indifference of many of the amateur climbers that make the attempt.  With Everest, it’s all here, and yet the film asks you to make up your own mind.  Me?  I’m still thinking.  Maybe that’s the real end game for this film.

The Visit: M. Night swings and misses. Again.

the visit onesheet

TwitView: There are lots of amazing”people in a new situation” horror flicks.  This ain’t one of ’em. Grade: C

Drats.  Add another so-so film to the post-Sixth Sense pile.  Perhaps M. Night tried to make this film kid-friendly, as the leads are teens.  But in trying to craft a spookfest that’s palatable to kids, the scares in The Visit come of more hinky than horrible.  There’s something off here, and it’s not just Nana and Pop-Pop.

The story is pretty straightforward; teens Becca and Tyler head out for a week at their grandparent’s house, so they can give their mom some much-needed vacation time alone with her BF.  Mom left home at 19, and hadn’t spoken to her parents in 15 years, so this is the first time the kids have visited.  All seems well ’til mid-afternoon, when Pop-Pop seemed tuned out.  And then things really get strange when night falls… [Read more…]

“Room” trailer gives good creep in a small space

roomHow’d you like to live in a 10’x10′ room?  No, hipsters, I’m not talking about one of those groovy Small Houses that are all over Pinterest.  I’m talking about a windowless room with no way of getting out.  For years.  YEARS.

Welcome to Room, based on the novel by Emma Donoghue.  Here’s the trailer, and it’s downright creepy…

Spooky, right? Not “monsters in the closet” spooky, but “wow, this could probably happen IRL” spooky.

Read on for the full press release!
[Read more…]

TwitView: The End of the Tour

end of the tour

Realistic, heart-wrenching and powerful.  A look at what fame is, and what it means, as seen through the eyes of two highly dysfunctional individuals trying their best to deal with the world.  Doesn’t matter if you’ve read the book; if you’re interested in digging into what makes people tick, see this film.  Grade: A

The book Infinite Jest may be over a thousand pages and absolutely intimidating for the casual reader, but The End of the Tour is the kind of movie anyone can relate to.  Everyone has, at some point, felt that sting of not truly fitting in, of trying to figure out how to live this life.  David Foster Wallace’s uncertainty, mistrust and reclusive behavior may not be what everyone experiences, but Jason Segel breathes life into the character.  He doesn’t make Wallace a loveable teddy bear in the performance, but you can understand Wallace.  It’s uncomfortable to see and painful to watch sometimes, but you get it.  Same goes for Jesse Eisenberg’s Rolling Stone reporter David Lipsky.  Lipsky has his own issues, and his own forces that drive him.  And the clash between Wallace’s understanding of fame — “David, this is not real” — and Lipsky’s not-so-secret lusting after it, makes Tour a fascinating watch.

Not to say that this film is for everyone.  It’s dialogue heavy and has an extremely sharp focus; secondary characters trot in and out of frame, and while their performances are equally good (especially Mamie Gummer as Wallace’s friend Julie, and Joan Cusack as chauffeur/Minneapolis tour guide Patty), nobody else is onscreen long enough to fully register.  So if you’re not down with a borderline Waiting for Godot/I’m Not Rappaport-esuqe plot, you may be bored to tears.

For those ready to dig in as deeply as the actors do?  You’ll be rewarded with an incredible look inside the creative process, and the minds that create/hope to create greatness.

TwitView: The Man from U.N.C.L.E.

uncleA gorgeous, fun-to-watch, muddled mess that brings back the very best of 60s spy films.  Beautifully shot, and brilliantly acted by Cavill and Hammer.  Ritchie knows how to frame and shoot a film to make it impossible for filmgoers to look away.  And with that much pretty onscreen, why would you?  The chemistry between Cavill, Hammer and Ex Machina‘s  Alicia Vikander is amazing.  I’m down for a sequel.  Grade: A-